Quick Breaks the 3.00 GAA and .900 SV% Barriers

October 19, 2009
By
0 Flares 0 Flares ×

As of tonight, he’s at 2.88 GAA and and even .900 SV%. I guess that’s not quite “breaking” that second one, but so what. It’s good.

via Jonathan Quick, Kings – Stats – Los Angeles Kings – Team.

Evernote lets you save all the interesting things you see online into a single place. Access all those saved pages from your computer, phone or the web. Sign up now or learn more. It's free!

 
0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 Reddit 0 StumbleUpon 0 0 Flares ×

Some posts the robot says are related, but I'll let you be the judge of that:

  1. Er, Quick can’t play for the Monarchs, just saying
  2. Price > Quick ?
  3. Quick speaks rhetorically
  4. Quick vs. LaBarbera [UPDATE post-Thrashing]
  5. Quick Transition
  6. I Would Just Like to Point Out That Erik Ersberg Has Not Won a Single Game Since Jonathan Quick Joined the Kings
  7. Hockey’s Future Top 50 prospects: #45 Jonathan Quick

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on October 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM and is filed under Weird Science. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

  • TomHughes

    I feel we need a bit more of a 2nd line center: what do you think? Does this play into a possible deal with Frolov? Or is Frolov tradeable for another LW? I love Frolov, he’s soo strong on the puck with a great shot, but I feel the trade is inevitable; what do you think we might get? Is part of the problem Frolov playing most of his minutes on the 3rd line? If he was getting passes from Kopitar, would his numbers be much better? Personally, I think Kopitar/Smyth is the best combination the Kings have going for them, and would be hesitant to break that up.

  • quisp

    I don’t think ##s are the issue with Frolov. It’s attitude and willingness to “buy in.” Intangibles. I totally and completely agree that we need a #2 center that’s not Stoll. Also agree, I wouldn’t break up the first line. I have said it a million times, but I would not be at all surprised or upset to see a Marleau for Frolov deal. Given the situation with both teams, I wouldn’t rule out Kaberle either. That would keep DL from having to think about bringing Hickey up for a year or two. Wait, when is Kaberle’s contract up? [looking it up] After 10/11 season. So that’s possible. I’m too tired to know whether I would like that. I think I would. Maybe. Don’t know. There are a lot of possibilities out there, and I’m sure we’ll hear about a zillion of them before too long, the rumor mill being what it is.