Comments on: Standings by Winning % (okay, points per game, which is winning % times two [and by winning % I mean % of possible points earned, not % of wins out of set of possible outcomes {possible outcomes being regulation win, regulation loss, OT win, OT loss, shoot-out win, shoot-out loss}]) http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2009/11/standings-by-winning/ Fact or opinion? Exactly. Thu, 23 May 2013 20:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: site http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2009/11/standings-by-winning/#comment-1428 site Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:16:41 +0000 http://kwisp.wordpress.com/?p=2614#comment-1428 … [Trackback]…

[...] Informations on that Topic: mcsorleys-stick.com/standings-by-winning/ [...]…

]]> By: quisp http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2009/11/standings-by-winning/#comment-298 quisp Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:48:57 +0000 http://kwisp.wordpress.com/?p=2614#comment-298 Hmm. Well, when I say winning %, I mean % of total possible points achieved. An overtime loss is not a loss. It’s half a win.

]]> By: dbushik http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2009/11/standings-by-winning/#comment-297 dbushik Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:34:44 +0000 http://kwisp.wordpress.com/?p=2614#comment-297 It’s close to win% x2, but not quite. That pesky OTL point…

]]> By: wavesinair http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2009/11/standings-by-winning/#comment-296 wavesinair Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:52:27 +0000 http://kwisp.wordpress.com/?p=2614#comment-296 Seems like points per game and decimals. Don’t see winning percentage…?

]]>