Nerdy Stats Update

Stats via Behind the Net (link in the right margin under stats).

Seven Kings have a PTS/60 (points per 60 minutes of icetime) above 2.0. They are: Kopitar (2.66), Smyth (2.59), Stoll (2.46), Parse (2.35), Williams (2.35), Simmonds (2.24), Jones (2.10).

GFON/60 (goals-for, while player is on the ice, per 60 minutes) leaders: Schenn (5.16), Smyth (4.18), Parse (3.52), Kopitar (3.39), SOD (3.28), Doughty (3.13), Simmonds (3.04), Jones (2.93).

QUALCOMP (quality of competition) leaders (descending order, three game minimum): Jones, Williams, Frolov, Brown, Kopitar, Doughty.

Players who have been on the ice for the most goals-against: Johnson (27), Frolov (18), Brown (18), Doughty (18).

Players who have not been on the ice for a goal-against: Moller, Loktionov, Segal.

Based on that, I would say Jones and Parse don’t suck. Also, you expect JJ and Doughty to be on the ice for lots of goals against — they get the big minutes against the best players — but for Frolov and Brown to be at the top of the list (while not producing on the offensive side) is troubling.

 

  4 comments for “Nerdy Stats Update

  1. December 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM

    Wow, that is a high margin of goals-against for Johnson at 27. That’s 9 more than everybody else!

    • quisp
      December 2, 2009 at 11:21 AM

      But it makes intuitive sense, since (1) he gets huge minutes, and (2) he’s a little reckless/sloppy, as we know. He’s been playing better of late, I think (especially last night). And there have been games where he’s followed a goal-causing screw-up with a game-winning effort (the recent shoot-out…).

      Frolov, also not surprising.

      Brown, though, that’s not good.

      • DougS
        December 2, 2009 at 12:34 PM

        Brown, with his “shoot just to see what happens” approach probably relies a lot on blind luck for goal-scoring. And I don’t mean that as a criticism, because I think his willingness to shoot just to create loose pucks in front of the net is very useful, like having a point shot on the wing. But I think it quite possible that luck will inflate or deflate his scoring numbers more than most forwards.

        Wouldn’t GFON also be a function of how much ice time you’re getting?

  2. quisp
    December 2, 2009 at 12:55 PM

    Ice-time affects everything (obviously a player who gets 20 minutes has more chance to get into the flow than a player who plays 5), but GFON/60 takes TOI into account by prorating a player’s production over a sixty minute time-frame. That way, the number levels the playing field in terms of sheer minutes, but not in terms of the differing effect of having 25 shifts as opposed to 3.

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.