Comments on: Kings with Purcell: 21-13-3 / Kings without Purcell: 4-4-0 http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2010/01/kings-with-purcell-21-13-3-kings-without-purcell-4-4-0/ Fact or opinion? Exactly. Mon, 20 May 2013 04:59:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Denise http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2010/01/kings-with-purcell-21-13-3-kings-without-purcell-4-4-0/#comment-578 Denise Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:59:15 +0000 http://kwisp.wordpress.com/?p=3422#comment-578 Outta this therefore because of this…

Still works.

]]> By: Mike http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2010/01/kings-with-purcell-21-13-3-kings-without-purcell-4-4-0/#comment-577 Mike Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:35:41 +0000 http://kwisp.wordpress.com/?p=3422#comment-577 Correction — post hoc ergo propter hoc. Bad latin.

]]> By: wavesinair http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2010/01/kings-with-purcell-21-13-3-kings-without-purcell-4-4-0/#comment-576 wavesinair Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:10:20 +0000 http://kwisp.wordpress.com/?p=3422#comment-576 Any hockey player (or professional athlete except figure skating) whose name starts with “purse” is doomed. Hey! Figure skating! There’s an idea Teddy!

]]> By: Mike http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2010/01/kings-with-purcell-21-13-3-kings-without-purcell-4-4-0/#comment-575 Mike Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:36:36 +0000 http://kwisp.wordpress.com/?p=3422#comment-575 Can you say Ex Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc?

]]>