<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What explains the Kings&#8217; turnaround?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/06/what-explains-the-kings-turnaround/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/06/what-explains-the-kings-turnaround/</link>
	<description>Fact or opinion? Exactly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quisp</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/06/what-explains-the-kings-turnaround/#comment-2981</link>
		<dc:creator>Quisp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=8825#comment-2981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember those posts. Toot away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember those posts. Toot away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayern Lieber</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/06/what-explains-the-kings-turnaround/#comment-2976</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayern Lieber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=8825#comment-2976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Own-horn-tooting time:

I took a lot of crap for saying many times starting last year that TM needed to go. Those BringBackTheShieldJersey and soccersucks posts were mine. My first tag line was, &quot;line combinations are irrelevant until Murray is gone.&quot; 

Arguing over and over again that the problem was more system/coaching than players. Yes, players were changed and improved. But the biggest difference Sutter has brought (and what has made the Kings so successful in the playoffs) is the attack-attack-attack on the forecheck, while with TM everything was about dropping back and being positionally secure that you won&#039;t get beat on defense.And, yes, Kompon still needs to go. Take your ring and go, Jamie. We hopefully will win despite our horrendous power-play which you are in charge of.

Moving Brown to left wing was, to me, a no-brainer. He&#039;s always been better over there and attacks the net more frequently and with more effectiveness. He sees the ice better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Own-horn-tooting time:</p>
<p>I took a lot of crap for saying many times starting last year that TM needed to go. Those BringBackTheShieldJersey and soccersucks posts were mine. My first tag line was, &#8220;line combinations are irrelevant until Murray is gone.&#8221; </p>
<p>Arguing over and over again that the problem was more system/coaching than players. Yes, players were changed and improved. But the biggest difference Sutter has brought (and what has made the Kings so successful in the playoffs) is the attack-attack-attack on the forecheck, while with TM everything was about dropping back and being positionally secure that you won&#8217;t get beat on defense.And, yes, Kompon still needs to go. Take your ring and go, Jamie. We hopefully will win despite our horrendous power-play which you are in charge of.</p>
<p>Moving Brown to left wing was, to me, a no-brainer. He&#8217;s always been better over there and attacks the net more frequently and with more effectiveness. He sees the ice better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cendejas</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/06/what-explains-the-kings-turnaround/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cendejas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=8825#comment-2965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is, by far, the best summation of events I have seen. Kudos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is, by far, the best summation of events I have seen. Kudos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougS</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/06/what-explains-the-kings-turnaround/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>DougS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=8825#comment-2964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you read Hammond&#039;s article on Jack Ferreira? Ferreira says that he was &quot;banging on the table&quot; for both King and Nolan back in October (part of his job being to keep a close eye on Manchester).

Your point about Voynov and the Carter trade echoes what I&#039;ve said about it, that what the deal so elegant from the Kings&#039; point of view was that Voynov was ready to step right on for Johnson. At worst, he would be a suitable patch, and at best he would be a real improvement. Since there was no place for him to play with Johnson around (and apparently, he thought about bolting to the KHL), the Kings really traded the 1st rounder + the difference between Johnson and Voynov, not Johnson in and of himself, for Carter. Advantage: Kings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you read Hammond&#8217;s article on Jack Ferreira? Ferreira says that he was &#8220;banging on the table&#8221; for both King and Nolan back in October (part of his job being to keep a close eye on Manchester).</p>
<p>Your point about Voynov and the Carter trade echoes what I&#8217;ve said about it, that what the deal so elegant from the Kings&#8217; point of view was that Voynov was ready to step right on for Johnson. At worst, he would be a suitable patch, and at best he would be a real improvement. Since there was no place for him to play with Johnson around (and apparently, he thought about bolting to the KHL), the Kings really traded the 1st rounder + the difference between Johnson and Voynov, not Johnson in and of himself, for Carter. Advantage: Kings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Cooney</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/06/what-explains-the-kings-turnaround/#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Cooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=8825#comment-2963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it makes more sense than entropy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it makes more sense than entropy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
