<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I prefer to just say no to Doan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/</link>
	<description>Fact or opinion? Exactly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Knob</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Knob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who else is responsible for getting him stronger? Himself. 

Either he doesn&#039;t have the desire, doesn&#039;t know how, isn&#039;t surrounded by people who do (his agent, trainers, etc), and/or he was never pushed to do so by management. They have had plenty of time to fix this glaring gap in his development. It is really not that hard to do, instead they (team? PT? himself?) have him doing side lunges with a 35 lb kettlebell which is gonna do absolute shit for his strength. 

RE him making his linemates better: I think you miss the concept. Setting up your teammates with glorious scoring chance after glorious scoring chance is in fact making them (look) better. He can&#039;t also put away those glorious scoring chances himself. They spent a lot of time in the offensize zone as well. The defensive chances against wouldn&#039;t have looked so bad if they had been able to put away some of those nice setups. Obviously his defensive zone play has some gaps, but imo a lot of that can be improved simply by getting stronger which he could be doing right now.

Who knows, maybe he is already getting stronger right now and shows up in camp significantly improved in that regard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who else is responsible for getting him stronger? Himself. </p>
<p>Either he doesn&#8217;t have the desire, doesn&#8217;t know how, isn&#8217;t surrounded by people who do (his agent, trainers, etc), and/or he was never pushed to do so by management. They have had plenty of time to fix this glaring gap in his development. It is really not that hard to do, instead they (team? PT? himself?) have him doing side lunges with a 35 lb kettlebell which is gonna do absolute shit for his strength. </p>
<p>RE him making his linemates better: I think you miss the concept. Setting up your teammates with glorious scoring chance after glorious scoring chance is in fact making them (look) better. He can&#8217;t also put away those glorious scoring chances himself. They spent a lot of time in the offensize zone as well. The defensive chances against wouldn&#8217;t have looked so bad if they had been able to put away some of those nice setups. Obviously his defensive zone play has some gaps, but imo a lot of that can be improved simply by getting stronger which he could be doing right now.</p>
<p>Who knows, maybe he is already getting stronger right now and shows up in camp significantly improved in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quisp</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3367</link>
		<dc:creator>Quisp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get it. Prospects are unproven. Doan is better than Stoll. I don&#039;t think I said (or didn&#039;t mean to say) that Toffoli would be harmed by a year or two in the AHL. I still would rather see him on the Kings. 


&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;And I&#039;m pretty sure Lombardi&#039;s staff has evaluated future Toffoli versus present Doan; they&#039;re offering a contract to Doan anyway. Maybe he doesn&#039;t even see Toffoli and Doan in conflict.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;


I think having a mediocre third line was a huge part of the problem last season -- during the scary problem part, not the winning the cup part. Maybe Lombardi thinks the problem was Murray and now that&#039;s solved. Maybe he&#039;s right. 


But I still want a third line that is a pure offensive line that destroys people with speed and snipery goodness. It&#039;s highly unlikely any Loktionov or Toffoli will have a shot no matter how good they are, when the personality and concept of the third line -- not to mention the personnel -- is set. Remember when everyone was upset about the third line of Frolov/Handzus/Simmonds costing $7MM? Gagne/Stoll/Doan = $10-11MM, or thereabouts. 


I&#039;m not saying I&#039;m right. It&#039;s just what I would do. I&#039;m wrong all the time. I would have traded Brown. 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get it. Prospects are unproven. Doan is better than Stoll. I don&#8217;t think I said (or didn&#8217;t mean to say) that Toffoli would be harmed by a year or two in the AHL. I still would rather see him on the Kings. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;And I&#8217;m pretty sure Lombardi&#8217;s staff has evaluated future Toffoli versus present Doan; they&#8217;re offering a contract to Doan anyway. Maybe he doesn&#8217;t even see Toffoli and Doan in conflict.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>I think having a mediocre third line was a huge part of the problem last season &#8212; during the scary problem part, not the winning the cup part. Maybe Lombardi thinks the problem was Murray and now that&#8217;s solved. Maybe he&#8217;s right. </p>
<p>But I still want a third line that is a pure offensive line that destroys people with speed and snipery goodness. It&#8217;s highly unlikely any Loktionov or Toffoli will have a shot no matter how good they are, when the personality and concept of the third line &#8212; not to mention the personnel &#8212; is set. Remember when everyone was upset about the third line of Frolov/Handzus/Simmonds costing $7MM? Gagne/Stoll/Doan = $10-11MM, or thereabouts. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;m right. It&#8217;s just what I would do. I&#8217;m wrong all the time. I would have traded Brown. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quisp</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3366</link>
		<dc:creator>Quisp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not a question of &quot;any&quot; other players or &quot;some&quot; young players. Parise I don&#039;t mind making room for. The Kings need scoring, power play and 5on5. Doan doesn&#039;t address that. Doan addresses a grit and leadership issue that...well...the Kings don&#039;t have that issue. So in that sense, sure, I will avoid veterans who don&#039;t address our needs in favor of prospects who may or may not be ready but do actually address our needs. 


And I don&#039;t like the idea of a third line that is really just an inferior version of the first two lines, a hybrid checking-scoring line that isn&#039;t that good at either. 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a question of &#8220;any&#8221; other players or &#8220;some&#8221; young players. Parise I don&#8217;t mind making room for. The Kings need scoring, power play and 5on5. Doan doesn&#8217;t address that. Doan addresses a grit and leadership issue that&#8230;well&#8230;the Kings don&#8217;t have that issue. So in that sense, sure, I will avoid veterans who don&#8217;t address our needs in favor of prospects who may or may not be ready but do actually address our needs. </p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t like the idea of a third line that is really just an inferior version of the first two lines, a hybrid checking-scoring line that isn&#8217;t that good at either. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USHA#17</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3365</link>
		<dc:creator>USHA#17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ladder concept is the future.  On that count LA is in great shape.

Doan, uh, if we had to.  How about this, drop Fraser and Stoll, sign Doan.  Oh, but we don&#039;t have to sign Doan.  Just like I understand but can not countenance his frustration.  

Loktiionov, man he needs to eat lots of chicken this off season.  Fill up on those hormones they use to grow these massive, leg breaking chicken breasts found 16 per package at Costco.  That boy has got the smarts but sure needs some muscle.   

But its the ELC rotation that (IMO) is key to building anything close to a consistently deep playoff team. 

And Doan.  Maybe he wises up when he stops wondering the desert and ceases to devolve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ladder concept is the future.  On that count LA is in great shape.</p>
<p>Doan, uh, if we had to.  How about this, drop Fraser and Stoll, sign Doan.  Oh, but we don&#8217;t have to sign Doan.  Just like I understand but can not countenance his frustration.  </p>
<p>Loktiionov, man he needs to eat lots of chicken this off season.  Fill up on those hormones they use to grow these massive, leg breaking chicken breasts found 16 per package at Costco.  That boy has got the smarts but sure needs some muscle.   </p>
<p>But its the ELC rotation that (IMO) is key to building anything close to a consistently deep playoff team. </p>
<p>And Doan.  Maybe he wises up when he stops wondering the desert and ceases to devolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3364</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love that transition from Lokti was just on a crappy line that did ok at ragging the puck in the offensive zone and people are just looking at his stats.  Then your &quot;but&quot; is he&#039;s &quot;weak and shortish and small and not muscular.&quot;  And then you generally point out he sucks a defensive zone.  Not sure why blame management.  They&#039;ve tried him away from center but he&#039;s looked even more lost on wing.


I agree with all you said in the second half of your post.  Your point on the first half might be somewhat valid in that he didn&#039;t have greatest wingers.  But the job of a center is to make his wingers better.  Not the other way around.  And if he can&#039;t do that then at least he better be covering his responsibilities defensively.  


So do we retool the 3rd or 4th line w/ wingers to help Lokti?  I say he either takes a giant leap in his abilities at center, learns to transition to wing or finds some other way to become a versatile player that can get spot duty and then maybe move up the lines. Short of that we trade him this season.  

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that transition from Lokti was just on a crappy line that did ok at ragging the puck in the offensive zone and people are just looking at his stats.  Then your &#8220;but&#8221; is he&#8217;s &#8220;weak and shortish and small and not muscular.&#8221;  And then you generally point out he sucks a defensive zone.  Not sure why blame management.  They&#8217;ve tried him away from center but he&#8217;s looked even more lost on wing.</p>
<p>I agree with all you said in the second half of your post.  Your point on the first half might be somewhat valid in that he didn&#8217;t have greatest wingers.  But the job of a center is to make his wingers better.  Not the other way around.  And if he can&#8217;t do that then at least he better be covering his responsibilities defensively.  </p>
<p>So do we retool the 3rd or 4th line w/ wingers to help Lokti?  I say he either takes a giant leap in his abilities at center, learns to transition to wing or finds some other way to become a versatile player that can get spot duty and then maybe move up the lines. Short of that we trade him this season.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jewelsfromthecrown</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3363</link>
		<dc:creator>jewelsfromthecrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are we really not going to add any other player because some young players *might* be blocked? Either they&#039;re good enough to be added, or they&#039;re not. Veterans can be moved if the Kings are lucky enough to actually have a surplus of wingers. That&#039;s happened so rarely, it seems odd to plan their team around it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we really not going to add any other player because some young players *might* be blocked? Either they&#8217;re good enough to be added, or they&#8217;re not. Veterans can be moved if the Kings are lucky enough to actually have a surplus of wingers. That&#8217;s happened so rarely, it seems odd to plan their team around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jewelsfromthecrown</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3362</link>
		<dc:creator>jewelsfromthecrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I don&#039;t see how it&#039;s any riskier to give a shot to Toffoli, who has 
strong upside potential, in 2013-14. Or to King, who is still young and 
may not have hit his ceiling as an NHL player.&quot;

There&#039;s where we differ, because we&#039;re projecting unknown commodities versus predicting a proven scorer&#039;s fitness and decline. Where&#039;s the line? I&#039;m not particularly a fan of the Doan option, but I don&#039;t see how prospects are more certain than him. It&#039;s a guess. And I&#039;m pretty sure Lombardi&#039;s staff has evaluated future Toffoli versus present Doan; they&#039;re offering a contract to Doan anyway. Maybe he doesn&#039;t even see Toffoli and Doan in conflict.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t see how it&#8217;s any riskier to give a shot to Toffoli, who has<br />
strong upside potential, in 2013-14. Or to King, who is still young and<br />
may not have hit his ceiling as an NHL player.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s where we differ, because we&#8217;re projecting unknown commodities versus predicting a proven scorer&#8217;s fitness and decline. Where&#8217;s the line? I&#8217;m not particularly a fan of the Doan option, but I don&#8217;t see how prospects are more certain than him. It&#8217;s a guess. And I&#8217;m pretty sure Lombardi&#8217;s staff has evaluated future Toffoli versus present Doan; they&#8217;re offering a contract to Doan anyway. Maybe he doesn&#8217;t even see Toffoli and Doan in conflict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jewelsfromthecrown</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3361</link>
		<dc:creator>jewelsfromthecrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just don&#039;t see how keeping Toffoli in the AHL for a year or two does any harm (ask the Red Wings). We really don&#039;t know much about how he will actually fare at the NHL level.



And to the idea that Shane Doan isn&#039;t going to help scoring 5v5 -- he&#039;s much, much better at that than Stoll, if that means anything.

Not all veterans are the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see how keeping Toffoli in the AHL for a year or two does any harm (ask the Red Wings). We really don&#8217;t know much about how he will actually fare at the NHL level.</p>
<p>And to the idea that Shane Doan isn&#8217;t going to help scoring 5v5 &#8212; he&#8217;s much, much better at that than Stoll, if that means anything.</p>
<p>Not all veterans are the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s been my point all along with Lokti but I think you said it better.  I&#039;m not saying Lokti is a lost cause.  I&#039;m just responding to what I think is Quisp&#039;s argument that Lokti would be a better option now rather than Stoll.   Maybe I&#039;m misunderstanding Quisp.


For all that Purcell has done in Tampa Bay I don&#039;t think that he would be the same guy here in LA.  Lokti is in a similar spot though in that I don&#039;t see him fitting in as a center on this team.  Even if Stoll went down I would see Lewis or Fraser stepping in first.  Or even play Carter there if you want to really roll 3 offensive lines as Quisp argues.  Or even Richardson has been better at center than Lokti in a pinch.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s been my point all along with Lokti but I think you said it better.  I&#8217;m not saying Lokti is a lost cause.  I&#8217;m just responding to what I think is Quisp&#8217;s argument that Lokti would be a better option now rather than Stoll.   Maybe I&#8217;m misunderstanding Quisp.</p>
<p>For all that Purcell has done in Tampa Bay I don&#8217;t think that he would be the same guy here in LA.  Lokti is in a similar spot though in that I don&#8217;t see him fitting in as a center on this team.  Even if Stoll went down I would see Lewis or Fraser stepping in first.  Or even play Carter there if you want to really roll 3 offensive lines as Quisp argues.  Or even Richardson has been better at center than Lokti in a pinch.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Knob</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/07/why-i-prefer-to-just-say-no-to-doan/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Knob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=9804#comment-3357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure everyone on the Kings, including our Caption, would welcome him on the team and be happy about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure everyone on the Kings, including our Caption, would welcome him on the team and be happy about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
