<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bettman and Jacobs vs. the World?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/10/bettman-jacobs-fehr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/10/bettman-jacobs-fehr/</link>
	<description>Fact or opinion? Exactly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jewelsfromthecrown</title>
		<link>http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/2012/10/bettman-jacobs-fehr/#comment-3718</link>
		<dc:creator>jewelsfromthecrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcsorleys-stick.com/?p=13499#comment-3718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this was an interesting contrast to Botta&#039;s article on the same subject, which said Bettman wasn&#039;t going anywhere. It&#039;s so hard to tell what&#039;s really going on. Fans&#039; best hope is for 23 moderates to push Jacobs off. It makes no economic sense to kill a whole season, and they&#039;re truly not far apart.



And who has Phoenix&#039;s vote? I have no idea. Jacobs, as acting chairman?



&quot;And didn’t someone just suggest in the last day or so that expansion 
fees (which constitute several hundred million dollars in instant 
revenue for the league) could play a part in settling the CBA 
standstill?&quot;


Yeah, it was Paul Kelly, Fehr&#039;s predecessor. The idea works, but like so many reasonable compromise proposals, it involves the owners making some concessions. They won&#039;t budge on HRR, so I don&#039;t see it happening. What&#039;s more likely is that the NHL will deny all expansion plans until affer the settlement, then keep all the lucrative expansion fees for themselves, since those don&#039;t go into the pot of revenue they split.


Contraction makes sense, but almost never happens in pro sports. Relocation would be better, but owners reap lower fees. How I wish we had a few economists running this league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was an interesting contrast to Botta&#8217;s article on the same subject, which said Bettman wasn&#8217;t going anywhere. It&#8217;s so hard to tell what&#8217;s really going on. Fans&#8217; best hope is for 23 moderates to push Jacobs off. It makes no economic sense to kill a whole season, and they&#8217;re truly not far apart.</p>
<p>And who has Phoenix&#8217;s vote? I have no idea. Jacobs, as acting chairman?</p>
<p>&#8220;And didn’t someone just suggest in the last day or so that expansion<br />
fees (which constitute several hundred million dollars in instant<br />
revenue for the league) could play a part in settling the CBA<br />
standstill?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, it was Paul Kelly, Fehr&#8217;s predecessor. The idea works, but like so many reasonable compromise proposals, it involves the owners making some concessions. They won&#8217;t budge on HRR, so I don&#8217;t see it happening. What&#8217;s more likely is that the NHL will deny all expansion plans until affer the settlement, then keep all the lucrative expansion fees for themselves, since those don&#8217;t go into the pot of revenue they split.</p>
<p>Contraction makes sense, but almost never happens in pro sports. Relocation would be better, but owners reap lower fees. How I wish we had a few economists running this league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
