Comments on: Travis Zajac deal is covered by old 100% rule, NOT the new CBA rule

By: No, no, no, that's NOT what the new CBA says _/ . MCSORLEY'S STICK _/ . | MCSORLEY'S STICK

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:05:41 +0000

[...] been over this before. Please see this post. Kukla’s Korner gets it [...]

By: Spectors Hockey | NHL Blog Beat – January 18, 2013.

Spectors Hockey | NHL Blog Beat – January 18, 2013. — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:06:49 +0000

[...] MCSORLEY’S STICK: An explanation of how Travis Zajac’s new contract is governed by the old 100 percent rule, not the new CBA. [...]

By: USHA#17

USHA#17 — Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:54:00 +0000

I imagine they are factoring salary inflation as hockey gravitates to becoming a three line game.

By: DougS

DougS — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 04:25:00 +0000

I’m not as concerned with the how it was possible as to why it was done. Is Zajac really worth that kind of money/commitment? Or is LL desperate to retain the top-6 talent that he has left, with Parise gone (and did I hear something about Kovalchuk thinking about staying in Russia?)?

By: Michael Mazzer

Michael Mazzer — Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:58:00 +0000

Should the Kings be interested in signing Redden?